<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/start.asp?submitted=true&amp;court=OK+CIV+APP&amp;days=30</link><description>The last 10 published decisions for the Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases</description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2009 21:04:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>OSCN Feed Generator 1.0.56[www.oscn.net]</generator><language>en-us</language><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><webMaster>webmaster@oscn.net</webMaster><item><title>STATE v. TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED EIGHTEEN DOLLARS, 104803; Comp. w/105803, 2009 OK CIV APP 53, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455165</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Arturo Ruiz and Regina Primeaux appeal from the district court's "Order Finding State Met Due Process Requirements For Notice, To Not Consider Potential Claimant's Jose Arturo Ruiz And Regina Primeaux Answer Because Filed Out Of Time, And Reinstating The Final Agreed Order Forfeiting In Part And Remitting In Part" entered in a civil forfeiture proceeding.     1      Based on our review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we reverse.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>HINDS v. JOHNSTON, 105412, 2009 OK CIV APP 54, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455173</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Appellants Marshall Johnston, Jr., and Estate of Flora Johnston,     1      (Johnston) appeal from the trial court's Journal Entry of Judgment, which quieted title in certain real property upon the determination that the Defendants/Appellees John H. Hinds and Rosa Lee Hinds (Hinds) had satisfied the payment terms of a mortgage on the property and were therefore entitled to release of the mortgage pursuant to    46 O.S. 2001 &sect;15   .     2      Hinds counter-appeals the trial court's determination that the statutory penalty (for Johnston's failure to timely release the mortgage) against Johnston is waived. ]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>ALLEN v. CITY OF CHICKASHA, 105872, 2009 OK CIV APP 52, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455143</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 This appeal arises from a controversy between the   City of Chickasha (City) and a property owner, Richmont Development (Richmont),   regarding two residential rental properties which City deemed dilapidated. The   trial court found Richmont, and Marianne Allen (Allen) individually as the sole   shareholder in Richmont, violated    12 O.S. Supp. 2004 &sect;2011    (hereafter &sect;2011) by filing this action in bad faith to "annoy and harass" City. The court awarded City $3,589.62 in attorney fees as sanctions, "jointly and severally," against Richmont and Allen, individually. Richmont and Allen appeal from the trial court's order adjudging the sanctions.     1      We hold sanctions were legally and factually appropriate and affirm.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>KING v. KING, 105023, 2009 OK CIV APP 49, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455136</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Petitioner, Ted Leon King (Husband), appeals the trial court's determination that certain realty and oil and gas leases were separate property not subject to distribution in his divorce action against Respondent, Margaret Raye King (Wife). We affirm.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>BANK OF OKLAHOMA v. ASHLEY, 105270, 2009 OK CIV APP 50, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455137</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Defendant, Regina Ashley n/k/a Williams, appeals from   the trial court's denial of her motion to release a judgment lien held by   Plaintiff, Bank of Oklahoma (Bank). At issue is a question of first impression:   Does a pre-existing judgment lien on a debtor's real property survive a   bankruptcy discharge in light of    12 O.S.2001 &sect; 706   (E)(2)? We find that it does and affirm.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>OKMULGEE COUNTY RURAL WATER DIST. NO. 2 v. BEGGS PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY, 105687, 2009 OK CIV APP 51, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=455141</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Plaintiff/Appellant Okmulgee County Rural Water   District No. 2 (Okmulgee) seeks review of the trial court's order granting the   motion for partial summary judgment of Defendant/Appellee Beggs Public Works   Authority, a public trust (Beggs). In this accelerated review proceeding,   Okmulgee complains the trial court erred in holding Beggs' violation of the   Oklahoma Open Meeting Act (OMA),    25 O.S. &sect;&sect;301   , et seq., &sect;303, rendered its Water Purchase Contract with Beggs unenforceable.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>BUFFALO v. BUFFALO, 105124, 2009 OK CIV APP 44, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=454686</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Defendant/Appellant, Kimberley Renea Buffalo (Mother), seeks review of the trial court's order granting the motion to modify of Plaintiff/Appellee, Allen Eugene Buffalo (Father), thereby changing custody of the parties' minor child from Mother to Father. In this appeal, Mother complains Father failed to prove the requisite material change of conditions, and the trial court erred in changing custody based solely on the expressed preference of the child, then only ten years old.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MARKES, 105462; Consol. w/105463, 2009 OK CIV APP 45, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=454696</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Kenneth Markes, Patrick Markes, Kathy Grim, and Debbie McClurg (collectively, Appellants) appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to confirm a sale of real property belonging to Wilma Markes (Decedent). The central issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that the personal representatives' exercise of the power of sale contained in Decedent's will was subject to a finding of necessity pursuant to    58 O.S.2001 &sect; 411   . After reviewing the record on appeal and the relevant law, we conclude that a finding of necessity was not required, and as a result, the trial court erred in refusing to confirm the sale. We reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to enter an order confirming the sale to Kenneth and Patrick.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>REDMOND v. CAUTHEN, 105923, 2009 OK CIV APP 46, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=454697</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 In October 2000, Petitioner, Kathleen Redmond [Mother], and Respondent, Brett Cauthen [Father], were married. Mother filed for divorce in August 2006. At the time of trial their daughter was 3 years old and their son was two years old. The trial court awarded Mother temporary sole custody of Children, and awarded Father modified standard visitation. During the temporary order hearing, the trial court ordered both parties to submit to an anger assessment. Upon completion of an anger assessment, Father filed a motion to modify the temporary order. The trial court granted Father equal time with Children pursuant to    43 O.S.2001 &sect;110.1   , while Mother remained the temporary sole custodian of Children.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>STONE v. LINDEN REAL ESTATE, INC., 106094, 2009 OK CIV APP 47, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=454720</link><description><![CDATA[&para;1 Shalonda and James Stone (Tenants) appeal the trial court's June 12, 2008, order granting summary judgment to Linden Real Estate, Inc. (Landlord). The appeal was assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Oklahoma Supreme Court Rule 1.36(a)(1), 12 O.S.2001 and Supp. 2003, ch. 15, app. 1. Based on our review of the facts and applicable law, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>