No Description Available, please check the website.

¶1 Respondent, Michael K. Redd applied, pursuant to Rule 8.1 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), (5 O.S. 2011 Ch. 1, App. 1-A), for an order approving his resignation pending disciplinary proceedings. Respondent's application and affidavit of resignation reveal the following:

No Description Available, please check the website.

¶1 Appellant Robert Lee Reed was tried by a jury in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2013-5435, and convicted of Lewd Molestation, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1123 . The jury recommended Reed serve twenty-five (25) years imprisonment. The Honorable William J. Musseman, District Judge, sentenced Reed in accordance with the jury's verdict and further ordered Reed serve a three (3) year term of post-imprisonment supervision. 1 Reed now appeals.

¶1 Appellant, Bruce Conway Stewart, Jr., was tried by jury and convicted of Driving a Motor Vehicle While Under the Influence of Drugs (Count 1) ( 47 O.S.Supp.2013, § 11-902 (A)(4)), After Two or More Felony Convictions, and Driving With License Suspended (Count 4) ( 47 O.S.2011, § 6-303 ), in the District Court of Custer County, Case Number CF-2014-256. 1 The jury recommended as punishment imprisonment for twenty (20) years and a $5,000.00 fine in Count 1 and incarceration in the county jail for one (1) year and a $500.00 fine in Count 4. The trial court sentenced Appellant accordingly but reduced the fine in Count 1 to $500.00. The trial court further ordered the sentences to run concurrently. It is from this judgment and sentence that Appellant appeals.

¶1 Appellee Kevin Dale Blacksher was charged in the District Court of Lincoln County with Driving Under the Influence (DUI) - Felony, After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies (Count I) ( 47 O.S.Supp.2013, § 11-902 (C)(2)); Driving with a Suspended License (Count II) ( 47 O.S.2011, § 6-303 (B))(misdemeanor); Failure to Carry Insurance/Security Verification Form (Count III) ( 47 O.S.2011, § 7-602 )(misdemeanor) and Speeding (Count IV) ( 47 O.S.2011, § 11-801 (B)) (misdemeanor), Case No. CF-2014-264. The State filed a Second Page Supplemental Information alleging seven prior convictions. Two of these prior convictions were misdemeanor convictions for DUI and were used to increase the DUI charge to Felony DUI. The additional prior convictions were for Second Degree Burglary, Felony Possession of Marijuana - Second Offense, and three convictions for Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property. With these five prior convictions, the State sought to enhance the range of punishment for the felony DUI charge pursuant to 21 O.S.2011, § 51.1 .

¶1 This is an appeal of a trial court's order granting a custodial parent's request to relocate the parties' minor children from Oklahoma to Texas. The order is affirmed. It was neither contrary to law nor against the clear weight of the evidence.

¶1 Peak Medical Oklahoma No. 3, Inc., d/b/a Forest Hills Care and Rehabilitation Center, appeals a trial court order denying its motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion to compel arbitration and stay the judicial proceedings in this negligence action. After reviewing the record on appeal and applicable law, we reverse and remand with directions.

¶1 Defendants/Counter-Claimants/Appellants/Counter-Appellees James H. and Jamie Wesson appeal from judgment finding Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/Appellees/Counter-Appellants Floyd and Margie M. Manar have an easement by prescription to use a roadway crossing property owned by the Wessons. The Manars appeal the trial court's finding that the road is not a public road. The clear weight of the evidence shows the road was not dedicated to public use nor was there prescription of the way by the public when it was a wagon trail; we therefore affirm the trial court's finding on that question. The clear weight of the evidence also shows, however, that the road was built and used with the permission of the Wessons' predecessors and therefore the trial court erred in finding the Manars have an easement by prescription. Permissive use of a road is a license which does not ripen into an easement. At most the Manars had a license which the Wessons were free to revoke. We therefore reverse the trial court's finding that the Manars have an easement.