A. The designated drug court judge shall make all judicial decisions concerning any case assigned to the drug court docket or program. The judge shall require progress reports and a periodic review of each offender during his or her period of participation in the drug court program or for purposes of collecting costs and fees after completion of the treatment portion of the program. Reports from the treatment providers and the supervising staff shall be presented to the drug court judge as specified by the treatment plan or as ordered by the court.

B. Upon the written or oral motion of the treatment provider, the district attorney, the defense attorney, the defendant, or the supervising staff, the drug court judge shall set a date for a hearing to review the offender, the treatment plan, and the provisions of the performance contract. Notice shall be given to the offender and the other parties participating in the drug court case three (3) days before the hearing may be held.

C. The judge may establish a regular schedule for progress hearings for any offender in the drug court program. The district attorney shall not be required to attend regular progress hearings, but shall be required to be present upon the motion of any party to a drug court case.

D. The treatment provider, the supervising staff, the district attorney, and the defense attorney shall be allowed access to all information in the offender's drug court case file and all information presented to the judge at any periodic review or progress hearing.

E. The drug court judge shall recognize relapses and restarts in the program which are considered to be part of the rehabilitation and recovery process. The judge shall accomplish monitoring and offender accountability by ordering progressively increasing sanctions or providing incentives, rather than removing the offender from the program when relapse occurs, except when the offender's conduct requires revocation from the program. Any revocation from the drug court program shall require notice to the offender and other participating parties in the case and a revocation hearing. At the revocation hearing, if the offender is found to have violated the conditions of the plea agreement or performance contract and disciplinary sanctions have been insufficient to gain compliance, the offender shall be revoked from the program and sentenced for the offense as provided in the plea agreement.

F. Upon application of any participating party to a drug court case, the judge may modify a treatment plan at any hearing when it is determined that the treatment is not benefiting the offender. The primary objective of the judge in monitoring the progress of the offender and the treatment plan shall be to keep the offender in treatment for a sufficient time to change behaviors and attitudes. Modification of the treatment plan requires a consultation with the treatment provider, supervising staff, district attorney, and the defense attorney in open court.

G. The judge shall be prohibited from amending the written plea agreement after an offender has been admitted to the drug court program. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to limit the authority of the judge to remove an offender from the program and impose the required punishment stated in the plea agreement after application, notice, and hearing.

Historical Data

---

Laws 1997, SB 645, c. 359, § 8, emerg. eff. July 1, 1997.

Citationizer^® Summary of Documents Citing This Document

---

Cite	Name	Level
Oklahoma Attorney General's Opinions
	Cite	Name	Level
	2022 OK AG 1,	Question Submitted by: The Honorable Dr. George E. Young, Sr., Oklahoma State Senate, District 48	Cited
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Cases
	Cite	Name	Level
	2002 OK CR 23, 48 P.3d 110,	ALEXANDER v. STATE	Discussed at Length
	2002 OK CR 27, 49 P.3d 761,	LOONEY v. STATE	Cited
	2009 OK CR 30, 220 P.3d 1140,	LEWIS v. STATE	Discussed
	2013 OK CR 18, 313 P.3d 274,	TATE v. STATE	Cited
	2014 OK CR 13, 334 P.3d 948,	SONNIER v. STATE	Discussed
	1999 OK CR 35, 990 P.2d 894, 70 OBJ 2766,	Hagar v. State	Discussed at Length
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
	Cite	Name	Level
	2013 OK 40, 303 P.3d 895,	STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. BROWN	Cited
	2018 OK 102, 433 P.3d 727,	D. A. v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION	Discussed at Length

Citationizer: Table of Authority

---

Cite	Name	Level
None Found.