OSCN Found Document:Damages for Sake of Example and Punishment of Defendant - Punitive Damages Awards by Jury
Title 23. Damages

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
  Title 23. Damages
    Chapter 1 - In General
        Section 9.1 - Damages for Sake of Example and Punishment of Defendant - Punitive Damages Awards by Jury
Cite as: O.S. §, __ __


A. In an action for the breach of an obligation not arising from contract, the jury, in addition to actual damages, may, subject to the provisions and limitations in subsections B, C and D of this section, award punitive damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant based upon the following factors:

1. The seriousness of the hazard to the public arising from the defendant's misconduct;

2. The profitability of the misconduct to the defendant;

3. The duration of the misconduct and any concealment of it;

4. The degree of the defendant's awareness of the hazard and of its excessiveness;

5. The attitude and conduct of the defendant upon discovery of the misconduct or hazard;

6. In the case of a defendant which is a corporation or other entity, the number and level of employees involved in causing or concealing the misconduct; and

7. The financial condition of the defendant.

B. Category I. Where the jury finds by clear and convincing evidence that:

1. The defendant has been guilty of reckless disregard for the rights of others; or

2. An insurer has recklessly disregarded its duty to deal fairly and act in good faith with its insured; the jury, in a separate proceeding conducted after the jury has made such finding and awarded actual damages, may award punitive damages in an amount not to exceed the greater of:

a. One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), or

b. the amount of the actual damages awarded.

Any award of punitive damages under this subsection awarded in any manner other than as required in this subsection shall be void and reversible error.

C. Category II. Where the jury finds by clear and convincing evidence that:

1. The defendant has acted intentionally and with malice towards others; or

2. An insurer has intentionally and with malice breached its duty to deal fairly and act in good faith with its insured;

the jury, in a separate proceeding conducted after the jury has made such finding and awarded actual damages, may award punitive damages in an amount not to exceed the greatest of:

a. Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00),

b. twice the amount of actual damages awarded, or

c. the increased financial benefit derived by the defendant or insurer as a direct result of the conduct causing the injury to the plaintiff and other persons or entities.

The trial court shall reduce any award for punitive damages awarded pursuant to the provisions of subparagraph c of this paragraph by the amount it finds the defendant or insurer has previously paid as a result of all punitive damage verdicts entered in any court of this state for the same conduct by the defendant or insurer. Any award of punitive damages under this subsection awarded in any manner other than as required in this subsection shall be void and reversible error.

D. Category III. Where the jury finds by clear and convincing evidence that:

1. The defendant has acted intentionally and with malice towards others; or

2. An insurer has intentionally and with malice breached its duty to deal fairly and act in good faith with its insured; and the court finds, on the record and out of the presence of the jury, that there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant or insurer acted intentionally and with malice and engaged in conduct life-threatening to humans,

the jury, in a separate proceeding conducted after the jury has made such finding and awarded actual damages, may award punitive damages in any amount the jury deems appropriate, without regard to the limitations set forth in subsections B and C of this section. Any award of punitive damages under this subsection awarded in any manner other than as required in this subsection shall be void and reversible error.

E. In determining the amount, if any, of punitive damages to be awarded under either subsection B, C or D of this section, the jury shall make the award based upon the factors set forth in subsection A of this section.

F. The provisions of this section are severable, and if any part or provision thereof shall be held void, the decision of the court shall not affect or impair any of the remaining parts or provisions thereof.

G. This section shall apply to all civil actions filed after the effective date of this act.

Historical Data


Laws 1995, SB 263, c. 287, § 2; Amended by Laws 2002, SB 1571, c. 462, § 1, emerg. eff. July 1, 2002 (superseded document available).

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 2001 OK CIV APP 98, 30 P.3d 1174, 72 OBJ 2435, BOATSMAN v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL YELLOW PAGES, INC.Discussed at Length
 2002 OK CIV APP 115, 60 P.3d 1058, MITCHELL v. GRIFFIN TELEVISION, L.L.C.Cited
 2006 OK CIV APP 80, 138 P.3d 567, HALE v. A.G. INSURANCE COMPANYCited
 2008 OK CIV APP 71, 190 P.3d 1202, COBLE v. SHEPHERDCited
 1996 OK CIV APP 52, 921 P.2d 1297, 67 OBJ 2524, Cooper v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCited
 2012 OK CIV APP 30, 276 P.3d 1069, NVI, LLC v. OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITYCited
 2012 OK CIV APP 87, 291 P.3d 628, ROBINSON v. SUNSHINE HOMES, INC.Cited
 2015 OK CIV APP 33, 347 P.3d 1044, CLABAUGH v. GRANTCited
 2016 OK CIV APP 63, 383 P.3d 780, STEIDLEY v. COMMUNITY NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS, INC.Cited
 2017 OK CIV APP 14, 393 P.3d 718, VANCE v. ENOGEX GAS GATHERING L.L.C.Discussed
 2017 OK CIV APP 23, 423 P.3d 684, HICKS v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA UNITED METHODIST RETIREMENT FACILITYDiscussed at Length
 2018 OK CIV APP 1, 419 P.3d 337, ONLINE OIL, INC. v. CO&G PRODUCTION GROUP, LLCDiscussed at Length
 2024 OK CIV APP 3, 544 P.3d 970, CARTER v. PENDLEYDiscussed at Length
 2024 OK CIV APP 4, 544 P.3d 980, PHILLIPS v. NATIONAL OILWELL VARCODiscussed
 1997 OK CIV APP 46, 943 P.2d 161, 68 OBJ 2701, PETTITT v. DOLESE BROTHERS CO.Cited
 2026 OK CIV APP 8, BRIAN HAMLIN v. EDWARD HENRY YOB, et al.Discussed at Length
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1998 OK 14, 956 P.2d 858, 69 OBJ 758, WILLIAMSON v. FOWLER TOYOTACited
 1997 OK 81, 944 P.2d 304, 68 OBJ 2224, YWCA OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. MELSONDiscussed at Length
 2003 OK 6, 68 P.3d 967, ROGERS v. MEISERDiscussed at Length
 2006 OK 47, 139 P.3d 897, LIERLY v. TIDEWATER PETROLEUM CORPORATIONDiscussed at Length
 2006 OK 58, 152 P.3d 165, GILBERT v. SECURITY FINANCE CORP OF OKLAHOMA, INC.Discussed at Length
 2011 OK 30, 258 P.3d 495, ESTRADA v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Discussed at Length
 2015 OK 85, 364 P.3d 644, GOWENS v. BARSTOWCited
 2016 OK 97, 381 P.3d 736, LEE v. BUENOCited
 2017 OK 11, 391 P.3d 105, FALCONE v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.Discussed
 2019 OK 28, 441 P.3d 1107, BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Discussed
 1999 OK 93, 995 P.2d 1088, 70 OBJ 3452, Payne v. DeWittCited
 2023 OK 86, 540 P.3d 1, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOC. v. HILLCited
 1997 OK 127, 948 P.2d 279, 68 OBJ 3316, Brock v. ThompsonDiscussed
 2025 OK 73, 578 P.3d 154, AMERICA’S CAR MART v. THE HONORABLE DAMON CANTRELLCited
 1999 OK 36, 981 P.2d 301, 70 OBJ 1445, Sides v. John Cordes, Inc.Cited
 1999 OK 63, 985 P.2d 773, 70 OBJ 2096, Frank v. MayberryCited
Oklahoma Session Laws - 2002
 CiteNameLevel
 2002 O.S.L. 462, 2002 O.S.L. 462, Torts; relating to responsibility for negligence; deleting exception; relating to exemplary damages; declaring certain damage awards void; relating to the Utilization of Unused Prescription Medications Act; limiting liability of entities. Effective date. Emergency.Discussed
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
Title 23. Damages
 CiteNameLevel
 23 O.S. 9.1, Damages for Sake of Example and Punishment of Defendant - Exemplary Damages Awards by JuryCited