OSCN Found Document:Liability - Scope - Exemption
Title 51. Officers

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
  Title 51. Officers
    Chapter 5 - The Governmental Tort Claims Act
        Section 153 - Liability - Scope - Exemption
Cite as: O.S. §, __ __


A. The state or a political subdivision shall be liable for loss resulting from its torts or the torts of its employees acting within the scope of their employment subject to the limitations and exceptions specified in The Governmental Tort Claims Act and only where the state or political subdivision, if a private person or entity, would be liable for money damages under the laws of this state. The state or a political subdivision shall not be liable under the provisions of The Governmental Tort Claims Act for any act or omission of an employee acting outside the scope of the employee's employment.

B. The liability of the state or political subdivision under The Governmental Tort Claims Act shall be exclusive and shall constitute the extent of tort liability of the state, a political subdivision or employee arising from common law, statute, the Oklahoma Constitution, or otherwise. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds tort liability on the part of the state or a political subdivision of the state based on a provision of the Oklahoma Constitution or state law other than The Governmental Tort Claims Act, the limits of liability provided for in The Governmental Tort Claims Act shall apply.

C. If an action is commenced alleging tort liability on the part of the state or a political subdivision of the state or an employee of the state or of a political subdivision of the state based on a provision of the Oklahoma Constitution or state law other than The Governmental Tort Claims Act, the action shall name as defendant the state or political subdivision against which liability is sought to be established. In no instance in any such action shall an employee of the state or of a political subdivision of the state acting within the scope of employment be named as defendant; provided, however, such person may be named as defendant under alternative allegations that such person did not act within the scope of employment.

Historical Data


Laws 1978, SB 586, c. 203, § 3, emerg. eff. July 1, 1978; Amended by Laws 1984, SB 469, c. 226, § 4, eff. October 1, 1985; Amended by Laws 1984, SB 544, c. 228, § 2 (repealed by Laws 1985, HB 1264, c. 357, § 5, eff. October 1, 1985); Amended by Laws 2014, HB 2405, c. 77, § 2, emerg. eff. April 21, 2014 (superseded document available); Amended by Laws 2015, HB 1681, c. 308, § 1, emerg. eff. May 12, 2015 (superseded document available).

Citationizer© Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
Oklahoma Attorney General's Opinions
 CiteNameLevel
 2001 OK AG 39, Question Submitted by: Leslie M. Bietsch, M.D. J.D., Commissioner of Health and State Health OfficerDiscussed
 2006 OK AG 11, Question Submitted by: Director John S. Richard, Department of Central ServicesCited
 1981 OK AG 99, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Al Terrill, Oklahoma State SenateCited
 1982 OK AG 80, Question Submitted by: The Honorable John Young, Oklahoma State SenateDiscussed
 1983 OK AG 190, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Clifton H. Scott, P.A., State Auditor and InspectorCited
 1985 OK AG 177, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Stratton Taylor, Oklahoma State SenateCited
 1989 OK AG 65, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Lewis Long, Oklahoma State SenateDiscussed
 1989 OK AG 75, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Gary D. Maynard, Director, Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsDiscussed
 1991 OK AG 21, Question Submitted by: The Honorable Rob Johnson, Oklahoma House of RepresentativesDiscussed
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1993 OK CIV APP 102, 859 P.2d 1131, 64 OBJ 2997, Kish v. City of Oklahoma CityCited
 1993 OK CIV APP 125, 858 P.2d 1288, 64 OBJ 2713, Turner v. Board of County Com'rs of County of GradyCited
 2001 OK CIV APP 95, 30 P.3d 1164, 72 OBJ 2225, TICE v. PENNINGTONCited
 2001 OK CIV APP 120, 34 P.3d 1171, 72 OBJ 3096, ZACHARY v. STATE EX REL DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSCited
 2001 OK CIV APP 144, 38 P.3d 927, 73 OBJ 174, GARST v. UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMACited
 2002 OK CIV APP 37, 46 P.3d 198, SKURNACK v. STATE EX. REL. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICESDiscussed
 2002 OK CIV APP 46, 46 P.3d 180, HULL v. WELLSTON IND. SCH. DIST. I 004Cited
 2006 OK CIV APP 129, 148 P.3d 888, PRICE v. WOLFORDCited
 2007 OK CIV APP 67, 165 P.3d 361, SPENCER v. CITY OF BRISTOWCited
 2007 OK CIV APP 119, 172 P.3d 639, BOYD v. TIETZEDiscussed
 2009 OK CIV APP 94, 227 P.3d 1111, GIRDNER v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF CHEROKEE COUNTYDiscussed
 2011 OK CIV APP 108, 265 P.3d 757, KENNEDY v. CITY OF TALIHINACited
 2012 OK CIV APP 5, 270 P.3d 205, WHITE v. CITY OF DEL CITYCited
 1996 OK CIV APP 101, 927 P.2d 57, 67 OBJ 3577, Holt v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Dept. of Transp.,Discussed
 1996 OK CIV APP 107, 928 P.2d 957, 67 OBJ 3652, Leding v. Pittsburg County Dist. Court,Cited
 2013 OK CIV APP 1, 294 P.3d 461, NAULT v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSCited
 2014 OK CIV APP 18, 320 P.3d 33, BURGIN v. LEACHCited
 2014 OK CIV APP 61, 333 P.3d 975, JACKSON v. OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLSCited
 2015 OK CIV APP 28, 346 P.3d 446, DUNCAN v. CITY OF STROUDCited
 2015 OK CIV APP 32, 347 P.3d 310, GJA v. OKLAHOMA DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICESDiscussed
 2016 OK CIV APP 81, 389 P.3d 375, DEAL v. BROOKSDiscussed
 2017 OK CIV APP 7, 394 P.3d 299, HOWARD v. GRADY COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE AUTHORITYCited
 2021 OK CIV APP 7, 485 P.3d 879, ROWELL v. BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MUSKOGEE COUNTYDiscussed
 2021 OK CIV APP 34, 500 P.3d 649, J.W. v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 of DEWEY COUNTYDiscussed
 2022 OK CIV APP 36, 521 P.3d 142, BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS. OF HARMON CTY. v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMM'RS. OF OKLA.Discussed
 2023 OK CIV APP 20, 530 P.3d 868, DORITY v. YODERDiscussed
 1996 OK CIV APP 125, 932 P.2d 540, 68 OBJ 338, WIRTZ v. GLANZDiscussed
 1981 OK CIV APP 80, 640 P.2d 1000, Brooks v. WoodsCited
 1999 OK CIV APP 16, 976 P.2d 562, 70 OBJ 1265, Lowe v. ChampionCited
 1999 OK CIV APP 77, 987 P.2d 426, 70 OBJ 2439, Hardy v. BezdicekCited
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1987 OK 64, 741 P.2d 449, 58 OBJ 2057, Fuller v. OdomDiscussed at Length
 1988 OK 138, 766 P.2d 339, 59 OBJ 3466, Thomas v. City of TulsaCited
 1989 OK 34, 770 P.2d 573, 60 OBJ 626, Gurley v. Memorial Hosp. of GuymonDiscussed
 1990 OK 21, 788 P.2d 962, 61 OBJ 674, Nguyen v. StateCited
 1992 OK 28, 826 P.2d 990, 63 OBJ 605, Beard v. VieneCited
 1992 OK 72, 833 P.2d 1218, 63 OBJ 1507, Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Cited
 1992 OK 73, 837 P.2d 876, 63 OBJ 1518, Walker v. City of MooreCited
 1992 OK 131, 839 P.2d 1345, 63 OBJ 2649, Gunn v. Consolidated Rural Water & Sewer Dist. No. 1Cited
 1993 OK 29, 850 P.2d 1065, 64 OBJ 955, Parker v. City of Midwest CityDiscussed at Length
 1993 OK 100, 857 P.2d 50, 64 OBJ 2317, Phillips v. WisemanDiscussed
 2001 OK 11, 19 P.3d 276, 72 OBJ 545, FEHRING v. STATE INS. FUNDDiscussed
 1994 OK 85, 878 P.2d 1045, 65 OBJ 2433, Rout v. Crescent Public Works AuthorityCited
 1994 OK 102, 882 P.2d 61, 65 OBJ 3052, Redding v. StateDiscussed
 1994 OK 136, 890 P.2d 1329, 65 OBJ 4037, Anderson v. EichnerCited
 1996 OK 142, 916 P.2d 1369, 67 OBJ 707, NELSON v. POLLAYDiscussed
 1997 OK 68, 940 P.2d 220, 68 OBJ 1856, SULLIVANT v. OKLAHOMA CITYCited
 1997 OK 92, 943 P.2d 595, 68 OBJ 2462, SCHMIDT v. GRADY COUNTYCited
 2002 OK 53, 49 P.3d 740, HATHAWAY v. STATE EX. REL. MEDICAL RESEARCH & TECHNICAL AUTHORITYDiscussed at Length
 1995 OK 56, 897 P.2d 1138, 66 OBJ 1844, Hughey v. Grand River Dam AuthorityDiscussed at Length
 1995 OK 65, 898 P.2d 741, 66 OBJ 2112, Meadows v. Pittsburg County Bd. of County CommissionersDiscussed
 1995 OK 135, 917 P.2d 1, 66 OBJ 3840, Lykins v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Discussed
 1995 OK 143, 910 P.2d 998, 66 OBJ 4005, Cruse v. Board of County Commissioners of Atoka CountyDiscussed
 2003 OK 2, 63 P.3d 535, PELLEGRINO v. STATE EX REL. CAMERON UNIVERSITYDiscussed at Length
 2003 OK 43, 68 P.3d 991, MUSTAIN v. GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITYDiscussed
 2003 OK 57, 77 P.3d 588, MORAN v. CITY OF DEL CITYCited
 2003 OK 6, 68 P.3d 967, ROGERS v. MEISERCited
 2004 OK 61, 95 P.3d 1090, MCCATHERN v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYCited
 1996 OK 12, 911 P.2d 914, 67 OBJ 525, Nail v. City of HenryettaCited
 1996 OK 16, 913 P.2d 1303, 67 OBJ 536, Duncan v. City of Nichols HillsCited
 2007 OK 52, 163 P.3d 540, TOMA v. TOMACited
 1996 OK 106, 932 P.2d 1087, 67 OBJ 2849, Calvert v. Tulsa Public SchoolsCited
 2008 OK 99, 203 P.3d 173, SPEIGHT v. PRESLEYDiscussed at Length
 2009 OK 4, 212 P.3d 1158, TUFFY'S, INC. v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITYDiscussed at Length
 2009 OK 25, 209 P.3d 288, SHEPHARD v. COMPSOURCE OKLAHOMACited
 2010 OK 9, 230 P.3d 869, MORALES v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY ex rel. OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPT.Cited
 2014 OK 42, 328 P.3d 1192, SMITH v. CITY OF STILLWATERCited
 2015 OK 13, 348 P.3d 194, MARIANI v. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITYDiscussed
 2015 OK 85, 364 P.3d 644, GOWENS v. BARSTOWCited
 1978 OK 164, 590 P.2d 1190, WALTON v. CHARLES PFIZER & CO., INC.Cited
 2018 OK 90, 432 P.3d 233, BARRIOS v. HASKELL COUNTY PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY; FOUTCH v. TURN KEY HEALTHCited
 2022 OK 5, 502 P.3d 1112, ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNECited
 2022 OK 25, 510 P.3d 824, CRAWFORD v. OSU MEDICAL TRUSTDiscussed
 2022 OK 46, 510 P.3d 181, KAMPHAUS v. TOWN OF GRANITECited
 2023 OK 100, 538 P.3d 138, ULLMAN v. OKLAHOMA HIGHWAY PATROLCited
 1981 OK 120, 635 P.2d 604, Ochoa v. TaylorCited
 2025 OK 12, CONNER v. STATEDiscussed at Length
 2025 OK 19, 566 P.3d 591, SANDERS v. TURN KEY HEALTH CLINICSCited
 1999 OK 20, 976 P.2d 1056, 70 OBJ 862, Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CityCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.