A challenge for implied bias may be taken for all or any of the following cases, and for no other:

1. Consanguinity or affinity within the fourth degree, inclusive, to the person alleged to be injured by the offense charged or on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted, or to the defendant.

2. Standing in the relation of guardian and ward, attorney and client, master and servant, or landlord and tenant, or being a member of the family of the defendant, or of the person alleged to be injured by the offense charged, or on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted, or in his employment on wages.

3. Being a party adverse to the defendant in a civil action, or having complained against, or been accused by him in a criminal prosecution.

4. Having served on the grand jury which found the indictment, or on a coroner's jury which inquired into the death of a person whose death is the subject of the prosecution.

5. Having served on a trial jury which has tried another person for the offense charged in the indictment or information.

6. Having been one of the jury formerly sworn to try the indictment or information and whose verdict was set aside, or which was discharged without a verdict, after the cause was submitted to it.

7. Having served as a juror in a civil action brought against the defendant for the act charged as an offense.

8. If the offense charged be punishable with death, the entertaining of such conscientious opinions as would preclude his finding the defendant guilty of, in which case he shall neither be permitted nor compelled to serve as a juror.

Historical Data

---

R.L. 1910, § 5859.

Citationizer^® Summary of Documents Citing This Document

---

Cite	Name	Level
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Cases
	Cite	Name	Level
	1977 OK CR 58, 560 P.2d 1003,	RUSSELL v. STATE	Cited
	2011 OK CR 6, 248 P.3d 918,	HARMON v. STATE	Discussed
	2011 OK CR 12, 252 P.3d 221,	UNDERWOOD v. STATE	Cited
	2011 OK CR 17, 254 P.3d 684,	CODDINGTON v. STATE	Discussed
	2011 OK CR 21, 259 P.3d 833,	CODDINGTON v. STATE	Cited
	2011 OK CR 30, 267 P.3d 114,	POSTELLE v. STATE	Discussed
	2013 OK CR 14, 306 P.3d 557,	SMITH v. STATE	Discussed
	2000 OK CR 5, 995 P.2d 510, 71 OBJ 427,	Powell v. State	Cited
	1975 OK CR 132, 538 P.2d 1061,	STOTT v. STATE	Discussed
	1966 OK CR 62, 414 P.2d 720,	APPLICATION OF SHARP	Cited
	1975 OK CR 172, 542 P.2d 598,	JUSTUS v. STATE	Discussed
	1969 OK CR 180, 456 P.2d 549,	KOONCE v. STATE	Discussed
	1982 OK CR 6, 640 P.2d 533,	BURROWS v. STATE	Discussed
	1982 OK CR 131, 650 P.2d 863,	COOK v. STATE	Discussed
	1983 OK CR 54, 663 P.2d 738,	GLIDEWELL v. STATE	Discussed
	1983 OK CR 57, 665 P.2d 1186,	DAVIS v. STATE	Discussed
	1972 OK CR 196, 500 P.2d 582,	WRIGHT v. STATE	Cited
	1972 OK CR 249, 501 P.2d 891,	GIBSON v. STATE	Discussed at Length
	1983 OK CR 169, 675 P.2d 142,	ALLISON v. STATE	Discussed
	1985 OK CR 105, 707 P.2d 35,	ROUBIDEAUX v. STATE	Discussed
	1987 OK CR 210, 743 P.2d 148,	HARDEMAN v. STATE	Cited

Citationizer: Table of Authority

---

Cite	Name	Level
None Found.