OSCN Found Document:Embezzlement Suits - Duty of Judge - Reports
Title 58. Probate Procedure

Oklahoma Statutes Citationized
  Title 58. Probate Procedure
    Chapter 3 - Executors and Administrators - General Provisions
        Section 234 - Embezzlement Suits - Duty of Judge - Reports
Cite as: O.S. §, __ __


A. Whenever the judge has reason to believe, from his own knowledge or from credible information, that any executor or administrator has wasted, embezzled or mismanaged, or is about to waste, or embezzle the property of the estate committed to his charge, or has committed or is about to commit a fraud upon the estate, or is incompetent to act or has wrongfully neglected the estate, or has long neglected to perform any act as such executor or administrator, he must, by an order entered upon the minutes of the court, suspend the powers of such executor or administrator until the matter is investigated.

B. If the judge determines on his own motion, or upon application by an interested party and upon proper showing, that an executor or administrator is subject to a conflict of interest which substantially impairs the executor's or administrator's ability to perform his duties as required by law, the judge shall suspend the powers of the executor or administrator with respect to the subject matter of the conflict of interest and appoint a special administrator to act with respect to such subject matter. The executor or administrator shall remain empowered to act with respect to all other matters.

C. The judge of the district court shall require each and every administrator, executor or guardian to make a report at least once in each year, showing the condition of the estate, and of all property, notes, monies, and other assets in his hands and the use that has been made thereof during the past year.

Historical Data


R.L. 1910, § 6296;Amended by Laws 1992, SB 1022, c. 395, § 7, eff. September 1, 1992.

Citationizer® Summary of Documents Citing This Document
Cite Name Level
Oklahoma Court of Civil Appeals Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 2001 OK CIV APP 109, 32 P.3d 221, 72 OBJ 2762, IN RE ROSECited
 1995 OK CIV APP 114, 905 P.2d 833, 66 OBJ 3514, Estate of Ringwald, Matter ofDiscussed at Length
 2006 OK CIV APP 134, 147 P.3d 303, IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HENDERSONCited
Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases
 CiteNameLevel
 1952 OK 71, 241 P.2d 390, 206 Okla 81, IN RE BEACH'S ESTATECited
 2023 OK 117, 539 P.3d 1286, IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF LANDINGCited
Citationizer: Table of Authority
Cite Name Level
None Found.